神偷奶爸2
As Japan pours billions into defense dreaming of arms-led prosperity, many warn history’s darkest chapters offer a sobering lesson_我的网站
A | 哈萨克斯坦新一届议会选举落下帷幕，托卡耶夫率领阵营拿下压倒性胜利，牢牢锁定未来五年的绝对执政话语权。 在大选取得完胜之后，托卡耶夫并未优先落地民生经济举措，反而第一时间推动全国社交礼仪改革。 这一赛后关键动作，被国际舆论广泛解读为当众给普京“上眼药”。看似普通的民俗调整，实则是他借胜选大势加速国家去俄化、重塑中亚地缘站位的核心操作。 Editor's Note:
August 15 marked the 81st anniversary of Japan's announcement of its unconditional surrender. Eighty-one years on, Japan, the defeated aggressor in World War II (WWII), has not only failed to conduct a thorough reckoning with its wartime aggression, but has instead intensified its drive to expand military power. In its newly released 2026 Defense White Paper on August 4, Japan says that "defense business not only possesses a high degree of public value by directly contributing to the protection of citizens' lives, but also contributes to Japan's economic growth through ripple effects into the civilian sector."
This line of argument, along with Japan's defense policies in recent years, in fact reflects a form of "military Keynesianism" - the use of military spending as a means to stimulate overall economic development. However, this logic of "trying to boost the economy through military buildup" has faced widespread skepticism inside Japan. Some scholars have also warned that Japan pursued a similar policy during WWII, which led to the expansion of the military-industrial complex (MIC) and, in objective terms, fueled the scale of Japan's war of aggression, bringing profound suffering to the peoples of Asia and the world. 
Pursuing a military Keynesian path
Japan's 2026 Defense White Paper, at 598 pages, has set a record as the longest in history. More alarming than its length, however, is the document's first-ever explicit definition of the development of the defense industry as an effective means of promoting "economic growth."
"The white paper 'stresses that investment in defense benefits the wider economy and people's lives,' according to a Defense Ministry presentation document," reported Reuters on August 4. "That message aligns with Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's broader use of strategic state spending in an effort to drive economic growth," Reuters commented. Previously, The Asahi Shimbun warned in an opinion piece that this entanglement of defense buildup with economic policy will, over time, slide into "military Keynesianism."
"Military Keynesianism" refers to the use of military spending as a tool to stimulate overall economic development. Since the Takaichi administration took office, Japan has been expanding its domestic defense market through year-on-year increases in the defense budget, while at the same time opening up international sales channels for defense production by relaxing export controls - thereby systematically pursuing a military Keynesian path.
In fiscal 2026, Japan's defense budget for the first time exceeded 9 trillion yen ($56.5 billion). Its defense-related spending has already reached 2 percent of GDP, according to The Japan Times. This not only means Japan's defense budget has risen for 14 consecutive years, but also indicates that the government is using fiscal stimulus to artificially create a large and relatively stable "arms market." The resulting closed-loop logic is clear: the government increases defense spending to expand procurement; defense companies receive orders and scale up production; and, through industrial-chain spillovers, related industries also expand output.
As Japan's new Defense White Paper says, higher defense expenditures will not only significantly increase orders in the defense industry, but also reinforce the defense production base through measures such as introducing mechanisms to assess corporate efforts and calculate appropriate profits for companies. These measures, the paper claims, are expected to generate economic ripple effects, "as well as technological ripple effects into the civilian sector."
What is even more alarming is that Japan is systematically removing the institutional barriers to the growth of its defense industry.
One long-standing challenge in postwar Japan has been the limited size of its domestic defense market and restrictions on arms exports, which have kept defense firms' profits relatively low and prompted some major companies to withdraw from parts of the military supply business, observers pointed out.
In 2022, however, Japan elevated the defense industry to a national strategic priority in its three key security documents, National Security Strategy, National Defense Strategy and Defense Buildup Program. In 2023, it enacted the Act on Enhancing Defense Production and Technology Bases, allowing the government to sustain and reinforce defense manufacturing through subsidies, capital investment and other measures. And in April this year, the Takaichi administration formally lifted the ban on exports of lethal weapons, fully opening the door for Japan's defense industry to enter global markets.
Together, these moves show that Japan is no longer content with relying on its Self-Defense Forces' limited procurement needs. It seeks to turn itself into a global arms supplier. This will inevitably intensify the regional arms race and seriously destabilize the security landscape in East Asia, warned some experts reached by the Global Times.
Of particular concern is that the focus of Japan's military Keynesianism has shifted from traditional weapons such as guns and artillery, to high-tech fields including artificial intelligence (AI) and drones, with an explicit emphasis on civil-military integration. Japan's new Defense White Paper places special emphasis on AI and unmanned systems, which are expected to become central issues in the year-end revision of its three key security documents.
Widespread criticism and concern
Japan's bid to jolt economic growth through higher military spending amounts to little more than a wishful gamble that "guns for butter" can be turned on its head. But when the fiscal question of "where will the money come from?" collides with public anxiety over "where is people's livelihood headed?", voices from international media outlets to Japanese scholars, lawmakers and ordinary citizens alike, are warning that the narrative of arms-led prosperity is not only unlikely to work, but could also drag Japan's economy into dangerous territory, observers noted.
Japan's fiscal expenditure faces "competing demands on the public purse," "but Takaichi has yet to explain clearly how she would pay for a further expansion without adding pressure on Japan's already stretched public finances," Reuters said on August 4.
In a Japanese-language editorial piece on August 8, The Asahi Shimbun pushed the debate further toward livelihoods, saying that military expansion would place a direct strain on the daily lives of Japanese people. The piece also cited a United Nations study saying that reallocating the same resources to education and healthcare rather than the military could generate more jobs. The International Monetary Fund has also warned that rising defense spending may, in the medium term, increase economic vulnerabilities, including through wider fiscal deficits, it said.
Strong criticism also echoes across Japan's political arena. House of Representatives member Joji Yamamoto accused the Takaichi administration of doubling defense spending and lifting bans on weapons exports, while shifting healthcare costs onto patients and eroding elderly care systems. If left unchecked, Japan will gradually turn into a nation sustained by the arms trade, seriously violating people's right to subsistence guaranteed by law, Yamamoto told the Global Times.
A risky gamble
Military Keynesianism is not only unlikely to sustain long-term economic growth in Japan, but also carries hidden security risks. Koji Sonoda, deputy editor at The Asahi Shimbun's Political News Section, recently cautioned that if defense budget expansion, initially justified by a deteriorating security environment, comes instead to serve the goal of economic growth through industrial promotion, the risk grows that spending will lose any effective restraint.
History has already proven this point. The global economic depression of 1929 triggered the Showa Depression in Japan, pushing the country's economy to the brink of collapse. At the time, rather than pursuing structural reforms, Japan's political and military leadership shifted the national economy onto a wartime footing, using military spending to boost demand and mask unemployment.
Meng Mingming, assistant researcher at the Institute of Japanese Studies of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times that in 1932, Korekiyo Takahashi, Japan's then Finance Minister, rolled out stimulus policies including yen depreciation and expanded fiscal outlays. Massive military spending paired with public works projects lifted domestic demand and enabled Japan to recover from the recession earlier than many nations. Takahashi became known as "Japan's Keynes."
However, the prosperity driven by fiscal deficits and military-industrial expansion was ultimately a shortsighted fix. Meng pointed out that, first, while wartime demand boosted Japan's heavy chemical and weapons manufacturing sectors to some extent, most military output was removed from the social reproduction cycle and constituted sheer waste. Second, heavy chemical industries relied heavily on resources such as oil, which Japan lacked domestically. This created a vicious cycle: military demand expanded heavy industrial capacity; that expansion increased Japan's dependence on overseas resources and markets; rising resource needs drove further military expansion to secure supply chains; and that expansion in turn required even more defense spending, further militarizing the economy. Finally, a coalition of interest formed among heavy industrial capitalists, emerging zaibatsu and the military. Military adventurism was no longer driven solely by the armed forces, but was backed by industrial and financial power.
Currently, many Japanese citizens have recognized the dangers of the Takaichi administration's policies and taken to the streets to protest.
Kazuo Adachi, a sexagenarian, told the Global Times in Japan that behind the administration's claim that the defense industry fuels growth lies the profit motive of the military-industrial complex. From policy deregulation launched under the Abe administration to accelerated implementation under the Takaichi administration, the path of military expansion catering to arms capital is akin to poison, fraught with alarming risks.
Marin Toyosu, a member of Japan's Generation Z, said the Takaichi administration's aggressive push for war preparedness essentially hides a self-serving agenda under the slogan of a "virtuous cycle between security and the economy." It abandons vulnerable groups to benefit a small circle of arms capitalists and represents an administration bent on stoking conflict.
"This military expansion agenda harms Japanese citizens and endangers people across the world," she noted.
Tatara Satoshi, an anti-war activist, pointed out that the Takaichi administration hypes up the "China threat" to justify military buildup while pushing the flawed argument that the defense industry can boost the economy.
This does not reflect the genuine aspirations of Japanese society or ordinary citizens. "Japanese people do not want war with China. They should unite to firmly oppose efforts to advance military expansion by stoking tensions and overstating supposed economic benefits," he said.
Global Times
。 托卡耶夫在公开场合直面普京、呼吁冻结并终止俄乌冲突的发言，并非随性的外交表态，而是哈萨克斯坦精心布局的外交铺垫，也为后续国内文化改革筑牢了外部缓冲空间。 外界之所以格外关注这番发言，核心原因在于哈俄长期的传统盟友与独联体协作关系，这番中立劝和表态，打破了以往哈萨克斯坦紧跟俄罗斯的外交常态。 据参考消息援引哈总统府公开官方记录，托卡耶夫在2026年7月俄哈元首会晤前夕，持续收到美欧多国的外交沟通信号，多国均希望哈萨克斯坦出面调停，推动俄乌局势降温。
B | 2026年7月25日，托卡耶夫在普京及多国媒体见证的公开会晤现场，正式提出阶段性冻结俄乌冲突、重启谈判的主张。 这套中立斡旋的公开表态，看似聚焦地区和平，实则服务于哈萨克斯坦的地缘避险与外交布局。 针对托卡耶夫的停火冻结提议，克里姆林宫发言人佩斯科夫会后公开作出回应，俄方明确拒绝冲突冻结方案，表示不会在未达成核心战略目标的前提下暂停军事行动。 过去四年，哈萨克斯坦持续推进本土化转型，稳步降低俄罗斯在本国政治、经济、文化领域的影响力，这是欧亚观察机构长期跟踪确认的既定国策。 一边持续弱化俄式影响力，一边公开为俄罗斯局势发声斡旋，这种反差式操作，是哈萨克斯坦典型的平衡外交手段，既不得罪俄方，又向西方释放友好信号，为自身战略转型争取窗口期。 哈萨克斯坦敢于做出这类偏西方的外交表态，核心依托于俄乌冲突带来的中亚格局变化。俄罗斯长期深陷俄乌战场，对中亚地区的管控和威慑能力持续弱化，对中亚各国的自主发展举措只能保持默许。 俄方为避免彻底失去中亚伙伴，对哈萨克斯坦与美欧开展矿产、能源合作的行为，始终保持包容态度，这也让哈萨克斯坦的外交试探毫无后顾之忧。 这场外交表态也让哈萨克斯坦稳稳占据道德制高点。主动担当俄西斡旋中间人，持续传递和平诉求，能让哈萨克斯坦在国际舆论中树立中立友好的形象。 后续俄罗斯若完成局势休整、重整区域影响力，哈萨克斯坦也能凭借此次斡旋姿态，对冲自身多年去俄化动作带来的争议，避免遭到俄方针对性制衡。 规避地缘风险、保障本国发展稳定，是此番操作的核心落脚点。
C | 俄乌战场外溢趋势不断显现，黑海、里海海域多次遭遇战事波及，哈萨克斯坦作为里海沿岸核心国家，随时面临战火外溢的风险。 同时该国持续对俄输出成品油等物资，存在被西方制裁的潜在隐患。对外呼吁停火、坚守中立，是哈萨克斯坦规避风险、平衡各方关系的务实选择。 2026年8月24日，哈萨克斯坦首届一院制议会库鲁尔泰选举结果正式出炉，托卡耶夫领导的公正党得票率高达71.17%，拿下绝对执政优势，其余参选政党得票率均未突破7%，选票高度分散。 本次选举是该国2026年3月经全民公投通过、7月1日正式生效的新宪法落地后的首次议会大选。新宪法将哈萨克斯坦延续多年的两院制议会改为一院制，彻底重构本国立法体系，为托卡耶夫后续改革扫清议会阻力，保障未来五年施政畅通。 手握压倒性胜势后，托卡耶夫第一时间在选举发布会抛出重磅文化改革举措，直接对国内流传数十年的俄式社交礼仪叫停。 据哈萨克斯坦主流官媒Tengrinews官方实录，托卡耶夫明确表态，男性拥抱贴面、亲友亲吻致意、男女互吻这类礼节，不属于哈萨克斯坦本土游牧与伊斯兰文化传统。 他强调，本国正统社交礼仪是见面右手抚胸致敬，女性按身份行屈身礼，杜绝无必要的异性、同性亲密社交接触。
D | 整场发言全程没有提及俄罗斯名号，但针对性极强。大众熟知的男性拥抱贴面、节庆亲吻等社交礼仪，均是苏联时期传承下来的典型俄式习俗，在独联体国家沿用数十年，深度融入哈萨克斯坦民众日常生活。
E | 托卡耶夫公开否定这类礼节的本土属性，本质就是从大众日常文化层面切割哈俄绑定，是极具针对性的“去俄化”软操作，也是外界解读为“给普京上眼药”的核心原因。
F | 这场礼仪改革，是哈萨克斯坦多年系统性去俄化战略中，最贴近民众日常生活的软性改革举措。
G | 结合参考消息梳理的官方改革轨迹，哈萨克斯坦近年已完成多维度转型：政治层面彻底摒弃对俄外交盲从，坚守独立中立的外交立场。 经济层面打通跨里海国际运输走廊，搭建绕开俄罗斯的中欧贸易通道，目前中国已连续多年稳居哈萨克斯坦第一大贸易伙伴。 文化层面持续更名俄式地名、修订历史教科书，弱化苏联叙事、强化本土草原民族历史主体性。2026年全新生效的宪法条文，也对俄语地位作出调整，弱化其通用特权，进一步巩固哈萨克语的唯一国语法定地位。 托卡耶夫的外交喊话与文化改革，一外一内、一软一硬，形成了完整的战略闭环。对外借助俄乌停火议题平衡俄西关系，规避制裁与战火外溢风险，拓宽国际合作空间。 对内依托大选胜势推进文化革新，从民众日常细节剥离俄式影响力，夯实国家文化主体性。两套动作相辅相成，让哈萨克斯坦彻底摆脱被动依附的地缘处境，在大国博弈中站稳独立站位。 俄罗斯当下的战略困境，为哈萨克斯坦的自主改革提供了绝佳窗口期。俄方军事、外交精力长期被俄乌冲突牵制，无力干预中亚各国的内部改革与外交布局，只能被动默许哈萨克斯坦的多元外交和去俄化举措。 这种难得的战略空档，让托卡耶夫的胜选改革得以平稳落地，不会遭遇俄方的反制施压。
H | 在我来看，托卡耶夫胜选后立刻推出礼仪改革、搭配此前的外交喊话，整套操作堪称中小国家地缘博弈的教科书式打法，没有任何激进冒进的痕迹。
I | 不少人简单将其解读为刻意对抗俄罗斯，这种看法太过片面，完全忽略了中亚内陆国家特殊的生存处境和发展诉求。 我认为托卡耶夫十分清楚小国立足的核心逻辑，地缘政治中从来没有绝对的盟友，只有永恒的国家利益。哈萨克斯坦如果一味依附俄罗斯。
J | 只会永远被锁定在俄方后院的定位里，丧失外交、经济、文化的自主发展权，国家发展会被彻底捆绑。
K | 可若是彻底倒向西方、激进对抗俄罗斯，又会直接激化地缘矛盾，让本国陷入动荡危机，得不偿失。 我觉得本次礼仪改革的高明之处，就在于温水煮青蛙的柔性节奏。
L | 政治、军事层面的激进变革极易引发大国冲突，普通民众也容易产生抵触情绪。
M | 而从日常社交礼仪、文化习俗入手，一点点剥离外来文化印记，潜移默化重塑国民本土认同，风险极低、效果持久。这种润物无声的改革方式，既不会激怒俄方，又能稳步推进去俄化的长期战略，兼顾安全与发展。 在我看来，此前的俄乌停火喊话，同样是精准的战略铺垫。
N | 主动扮演中立斡旋者，既能拉近与美欧的合作距离，为本国能源、经贸合作铺路，又能在道义上给俄罗斯留足体面，缓解俄方的抵触心态。
o | 表面是善意劝和，实则是为后续国内改革铺垫外部环境，最大限度降低改革阻力。 我觉得哈萨克斯坦的转型之路，给所有内陆中小国家提供了绝佳范本。 身处大国博弈的核心区域，不选边、不依附、不激进，依托各方资源发展自身，守住本国核心利益，才是长久立足的根本。 托卡耶夫胜选后的这番“上眼药”操作，看似是直面俄方的表态，实则是为哈萨克斯坦彻底摆脱依附、实现自主发展的长远布局。
p | 托卡耶夫的议会压倒性大胜，为其一系列改革举措扫清了制度阻力，也让这场针对性的礼仪改革拥有了落地底气。
q | 这场被外界视作给普京“上眼药”的操作，并非一时意气，是哈萨克斯坦多年平衡外交、稳步去俄化的延续。 依托俄乌局势带来的地缘窗口期，哈萨克斯坦以温和柔性的文化变革方式，悄悄挣脱传统俄方束缚。
r | 这种审慎且务实的博弈方式，也持续推动着中亚地缘格局发生全新的深度演变。返回，查看更多。
Current article:http://chenzhuaigecoupuhongyuntuizei.sbs/ocnwd/8tspq.html
Published on:10:01:02